Still, never mind, you don't have to fly around in an A380, and if you don't want to be propelled through the air with the greatest of ease by Rolls-Royce engines, there are other manufacturers. (I'm glad that even if we've abandoned some of our traditions, Rolls-Royce are keeping with the fine old British custom of producing shiny machinery that tends to spurt oil at random and then conk out.)
But today I read that Boeing's Dreamliner is even more of a recurring-bad-dreamliner than previously thought. After a number of years of failing to get the plastic wings to stick to the body (a trivial task for anyone with an Airfix kit and a tube of Bostik) it finally appeared they had things right, until the test flight this week where the aircraft lost primary electric power ... because of a fire.
Now I've been on a plane where the electrics weren't operating properly, and I've been on a plane where the engines were spewing oil as we flew along. But I've never been on board a burning plane with no electric power. That's a fairly large flaw, along with not staying up in the air when required.
I guess that this just shows that the old "If it's not a Boeing, I'm not going" slogan doesn't stand up to scrutiny. Whereas "Sit down and stop making a fuss, it's only an Airbus" fits more with European manners and deportment, and "When in a Dehavilland, you'll count yourself lucky to land" may just be realistic.
But you shouldn't base your choice of aircraft on what it rhymes with. If that had happened two centuries ago, I doubt the Montgolfier brothers would ever have got off the ground.
0 comments:
Post a Comment